Take Care LedgerA dated, sourced record of the second Trump administration

Mid-Decade Redistricting

Updated2026-11-08 Covers2025-08-07 to 2026-11-03

Summary

Starting in summer 2025, Trump urged states led by Republicans to redraw their U.S. House maps. States usually redraw only once every ten years, after the census. Trump wanted new maps in the middle of the decade to add seats that lean Republican before the 2026 midterm elections.1 Texas passed the first new map.2 California voters answered with Proposition 50, a measure on the state ballot.3 Then the Supreme Court decided Louisiana v. Callais,44 a case that struck down Louisiana’s map. After that ruling, several Southern states redrew their maps again.4,5 Texas drew its map to add five new seats that lean Republican. In the Nov 3, 2026 midterms, Republicans ended up with a net change of minus one seat in Texas.6,72 As of Nov 5, CBS News counted two House seats across the country that moved to Republicans. Both were in redrawn districts (TX-32 and TN-9).6 Louisiana’s redrawn 6th District goes to a runoff election on Dec 12.7 In Virginia, the state supreme court threw out a voter-approved amendment for a map drawn by Democrats.22 Then, 12 days before the midterms, the Justice Department made public a racketeering indictment of state Sen. L. Louise Lucas. She was a key figure in pushing the map through.48

Background

States normally redraw their districts once every ten years, after the census. The Constitution’s Elections Clause lets state legislatures set the “Times, Places and Manner” of elections for Congress. Congress can change those rules (Article I, Section 4, Clause 1).35 In League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry (2006),36 the Supreme Court did not rule that the Constitution forbids redrawing maps in the middle of a decade. In Rucho v. Common Cause (2019),37 the Court said federal courts cannot decide claims of partisan gerrymandering, meaning maps drawn to help one party. Federal courts can still hear claims of racial gerrymandering, meaning maps drawn mainly by race. Those claims come under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, which says states must treat people equally under the law.38 State constitutions and state laws set their own limits too. The Voting Rights Act (VRA) is a federal law against voting rules that discriminate by race. For many years, Section 2 of the VRA, 52 U.S.C. § 10301,39 required some districts where most voters belong to minority groups.4

House seats are divided among the states by population. The Fourteenth Amendment says to count the “whole number of persons in each state,” when dividing the seats.40 Article I of the Constitution gives Congress, not the President, power over the “actual enumeration.”41,8 That means the count itself. A census in the middle of the decade is legal. But a federal law says its results cannot be used to reassign House seats among the states (13 U.S.C. § 141(e)(2)).42,8 The Purcell principle comes from the Supreme Court case Purcell v. Gonzalez (2006).43 It warns courts against ordering changes to election rules close to an election.13

What happened

Texas

The White House urged Texas to redraw its map. Then the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) sent Texas a letter. The letter said four “coalition” districts, where minority groups together make up most voters, were unconstitutional. Gov. Greg Abbott pointed to the letter when he called a special session of the legislature.2 The new map redrew five seats held by Democrats.1 On Aug 3, 2025, most Democrats in the Texas House left the state. Without them, the House did not have a quorum, the number of members needed to do business. They stayed away more than two weeks.10 Abbott threatened to remove them from office.10 The House passed the map 88–52 on Aug 20. Abbott signed it on Aug 29.2

On Nov 18, a federal court of three judges in El Paso blocked the map, 2–1, as a racial gerrymander, meaning a map drawn mainly by race.11,52 On Nov 21, Justice Samuel Alito paused the ruling for a short time. On Dec 4, the full Supreme Court paused it, 6–3. On Apr 27, 2026, the Court reversed the panel without full briefing and argument.12,63,13,70 The majority on the pause said the lower court had “improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign,” which is the concern behind the Purcell principle.13

California, Utah and other 2025 redraws

Kansas Republicans did not start a redraw. Kansas kept its existing map for 2026.50 North Carolina adopted a new map on Oct 22, 2025. Ohio’s redistricting commission finished one on Oct 31. Its target was a 12–3 split in favor of Republicans.15 On Nov 4, California voters passed Prop 50 with about 64% of the vote. It replaced the map drawn by the state’s commission with one that favors Democrats.3 In early January 2026, a panel of three federal judges upheld the map, 2–1. The panel found that the challengers “failed to show that racial gerrymandering occurred”. The Trump administration had joined the challenge. On Feb 4, 2026, the Supreme Court turned down the California Republican Party’s emergency request. The order was unsigned, and no justice was noted as disagreeing. The map stayed in force for the midterms.58

Utah voters passed a measure against gerrymandering in 2018. In a lawsuit to enforce it, a Utah judge adopted a court-ordered map on Nov 10, 2025. The map has a seat in Salt Lake County that leans Democratic.16 In February 2026 the Utah Supreme Court declined to hear the legislature’s appeal, for reasons about which court has power over the case. On Oct 5, 2026, it heard arguments on which court may hear the case.51

Indiana

Indiana Gov. Mike Braun called a special session of the legislature on Nov 3, 2025.50,59 Vice President JD Vance lobbied state lawmakers. Then Trump said he would back primary challengers against Republicans who opposed the map. At least 11 Indiana Republicans received bomb threats or swatting calls, which are false emergency reports meant to send police to someone’s home.17 On Dec 5, the Indiana House passed the map 57–41. It would have divided Marion County, which includes Indianapolis, into four districts. Senate Majority Leader Rodric Bray had said the map lacked enough Republican support in his chamber.60 On Dec 11, 2025, the Senate rejected the map 19–31, with 21 Republicans voting no.17 Trump backed challengers against seven state senators. On May 5, 2026, five of those seven lost their primaries.18,61

Missouri map and referendum

On Sept 28, 2025, Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe signed a map that splits Kansas City.14 Opponents filed a petition for a referendum, which is a public vote on a law. On May 12, 2026, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled that the 2025 map stays in effect while officials review the petition’s signatures.50,64 Organizers had gathered more than 300,000 signatures. Even so, on Aug 4, Secretary of State Denny Hoskins rejected the referendum petition on the 2025 map. He said the referendum was unconstitutional. The organizers sued.28 On Sept 3, the Missouri Supreme Court blocked the map until the referendum vote. Hoskins was held in contempt of court, meaning a judge found he had disobeyed a court order.29,71 On Sept 25, the U.S. Supreme Court paused orders from lower federal courts. No justice publicly disagreed. Those courts had treated using the 2025 map as the choice that fit best with Purcell. The Supreme Court found that “the 8th Circuit was wrong” to do so. The 2022 map stayed in place.30

New York, Virginia and Maryland

A New York state court ordered a redraw of Rep. Nicole Malliotakis’s district on Staten Island. On Mar 2, 2026, the Supreme Court, 6–3, paused that order.19 The people who brought the case dropped their claims on Mar 19, and on Jun 17 New York’s legislature first passed SB 10637, an amendment to the state constitution. It would allow redistricting in the middle of a decade. It must pass the legislature again before it goes to voters, possibly in 2027.49

In Virginia, the legislature passed a map amendment to the state constitution twice. In February 2026 it also passed a map that would take effect only if the amendment won. The amendment allowed a map drawn by Democrats. On Apr 21, voters approved it, 51.45% to 48.55%.55,20 The next day, Trump called the vote “RIGGED,” and pointed to a “massive Mail In Ballot Drop”. Cardinal News reported that the claim was wrong.20 On May 6, the FBI searched the office of L. Louise Lucas, a key figure in pushing the map through. The search was part of a bribery investigation that a source said began under Biden. Lucas said the search was an attempt to “intimidate and silence.”21 On May 8, the Virginia Supreme Court threw out the amendment 4–3, ruling that it broke the state constitution’s intervening-election rule. That rule requires a House of Delegates election between the legislature’s two votes on an amendment. On May 15 the U.S. Supreme Court turned down Democrats’ emergency request to pause that ruling.22,55 A grand jury had charged Lucas and six relatives and associates with racketeering on Oct 14. On Oct 22, 12 days before the midterms, DOJ made that indictment public. Attorney General Todd Blanche said DOJ’s pre-election “blackout period” is a practice, not a law. Lucas said, “I will not be intimidated.”48

In Maryland, a bill to draw a new map, HB 488, died when the regular session ended on Apr 13, 2026. The Senate had not acted on it.57 Gov. Wes Moore then held a special session on Aug 3–5. It passed HB 2100, which is an amendment to the state constitution, not a map.31 A 2022 court ruling against a Democratic congressional map was based on rules that districts be compact. The amendment limits those compactness rules to state legislative districts.31 State courts kept the amendment off the ballot. Then on Sept 3, the Maryland Supreme Court reversed them and ordered the ballot language rewritten.69 Voters approved the amendment as Question 3 on Nov 3.57,31

Callais and the Southern maps

On Apr 29, 2026, the Supreme Court struck down Louisiana’s map 6–3, removing the state’s second district where most voters are Black.4 Louisiana Secretary of State Nancy Landry then stopped the state’s House primary while absentee voting was already underway.23 On May 4, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a map projected to gain Republicans up to four seats.5 On May 26, a court refused to issue a preliminary injunction, an order that would have stopped the map until the case was decided. The Florida Supreme Court left the map in place on June 10.53,65,54 On May 7, Tennessee repealed its state law that barred redrawing congressional maps in the middle of a decade. It also split Rep. Steve Cohen’s district in Memphis.24 On July 23, a panel of three federal judges refused to issue a preliminary injunction in Sherman v. Hargett. Two federal cases are still pending.54

On May 29, the Louisiana Senate gave final approval, 28–10, to a new map. The map ends the 6th District’s status as a district where most voters are Black. According to the Associated Press (AP), it does this by redrawing Rep. Cleo Fields’ district around mostly white communities near Baton Rouge and in southern Louisiana.25 The map is challenged in Callais v. Landry. There was no ruling as of Sept 25.54 On May 11, because of Callais, the Supreme Court lifted an order that had blocked Alabama’s map. On June 2, it voted 6–3 to let Alabama use a 2023 map. A panel of three judges had found that map unconstitutional for the second time. The earlier ruling found the map was meant to discriminate. Justice Sotomayor disagreed with the order. She wrote that it “disregards both democratic values and the rule of law.”26 Special primaries for the affected districts were held Aug 11.54

On May 18, the Court reversed a 2024 order that had required Mississippi to redraw its legislative districts.54,66 Georgia’s special session on Jun 17 did not take up redistricting.54 South Carolina tried to eliminate Rep. Jim Clyburn’s district, where most voters are Black. The effort ended on May 26. That day, 12 Republican senators joined Democrats in refusing to end debate.27

Census and apportionment

On Aug 7, 2025, while Texas was redrawing its map, Trump said he had told the Commerce Department to begin a “new and highly accurate CENSUS.” He said that in it, “People who are in our Country illegally WILL NOT BE COUNTED”. The Commerce Department said the Census Bureau would “reflect the number of legal residents”. It gave no plan.8 On Feb 6, 2026, AP reported on the Census Bureau’s 2030 practice test. The bureau planned to use the American Community Survey form, which asks about citizenship. That week, the administration had cut the test from six sites to two: Huntsville, Ala., and Spartanburg, S.C.9,62 According to AP, no census form has asked that question in 75 years.9,62

Key dates

Why it matters

The Elections Clause (Article I, Section 4, Clause 1)35 and redrawing mid-decade. This clause lets state legislatures set the rules for electing Congress, and lets Congress change them. The question is whether a state may replace a lawful map between censuses to help one party. The federal starting point comes from LULAC v. Perry (2006) and Rucho (2019). Under those cases, mid-decade and partisan redistricting are left to the states and to Congress.36,37 The record shows no action by Congress on mid-decade redistricting.

The Equal Protection Clause (Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1)38 and racial gerrymandering. The question is whether the Texas and Alabama maps were drawn on purpose to discriminate by race.11,26 In Texas, DOJ’s Civil Rights Division called four coalition districts unconstitutional. The El Paso panel found the challengers were likely to prove a racial gerrymander. The Supreme Court paused that ruling and then reversed it without full argument.2,11,12 In Alabama, the Court let a map stand after a panel found it unconstitutional a second time. The first ruling had found it was meant to discriminate.26 The record does not include the administration’s filings in the Texas, Alabama and Louisiana cases. In those cases the states, not the federal government, were the defendants.

Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (52 U.S.C. § 10301)39 after Callais44. The question is what Section 2 still requires after Callais. After Callais, Alabama’s and Louisiana’s new maps each removed a district where most voters are Black. Tennessee’s new map split the Memphis district.4,26,25,24 The record does not explain the reasoning of the Callais majority. Callais v. Landry, the challenge to Louisiana’s replacement map, is still pending.54

The Purcell principle (Purcell v. Gonzalez, 2006)43. The question is how close to an election Purcell stops courts from ordering changes. In the Texas pause, the majority said the lower court had “improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign,” a Purcell concern. In Missouri, the Court found that “the 8th Circuit was wrong” on the Purcell point (Sept 25, 2026). No justice publicly disagreed with the Missouri order.13,30

Federal review of state-court redistricting orders. The question is whether the U.S. Supreme Court may pause a state court’s redistricting order before the state’s highest court has ruled. The Court paused the New York order. Justice Sotomayor disagreed. In her dissent, she described a federal pause coming before a state’s high court could act as unprecedented.19

State constitutional and statutory limits. Several maps turned on state law. These included Virginia’s intervening-election requirement45 and Florida’s Fair Districts provision, which sets standards for drawing congressional districts.46 They also included Missouri’s referendum, Utah’s 2018 initiative, Maryland’s compactness rules, New York’s amendment process and Tennessee’s repealed bar in state law.16,28,31,49,54 State courts applied these limits. They threw out Virginia’s amendment, left Florida’s map in place, blocked Missouri’s map and put Maryland’s amendment on the ballot (see the state sections above). The U.S. Supreme Court declined to disturb the Virginia ruling.22,54,29,57,55 Utah’s appeal has not been decided.51

Justice Manual § 9-85.50047 (actions that may affect an election). The Justice Manual is the Justice Department’s written set of policies for its lawyers. The question is whether the timing of the Lucas indictment fits § 9-85.500. That section bars prosecutors from timing any action to affect an election. Blanche said the “blackout period” is a practice, not a law.48 No court or official body in the record has addressed the timing.

Census and apportionment (Article I, Section 2, Clause 341; Fourteenth Amendment, Section 240; 13 U.S.C. § 141(e)(2)42). Apportionment means dividing House seats among the states by population. The question is whether the President may order a census that leaves out unauthorized immigrants.8 The Commerce Department said the bureau would “reflect the number of legal residents.”8 The record does not include the administration’s stated legal basis. No court has ruled.

Outcome

Where things stand

In the Nov 3, 2026 midterms, Republicans gained two redrawn districts, TX-32 and TN-9, according to CBS News. LA-6 is still pending.6 In Texas, Democrats flipped TX-15 (Bobby Pulido beat Rep. Monica De La Cruz). Democrats also won the open TX-35 seat, which Republicans had redrawn. They held TX-9, TX-28 and TX-34, and the net result for Republicans was −1.6 As of Nov 5, CBS counted 43 House seats across the country that moved to Democrats and 2 that moved to Republicans. CBS said the Republican Party was “on track to lose all of the districts it tried to gerrymander.”6 Three rulings remain in effect: Callais, the Apr 27, 2026 reversal in the Texas case and the June 2 pause in the Alabama case.4,12,26

Still moving are the LA-6 runoff on Dec 12 and the items marked Pending below. No authoritative net seat count for the redrawn maps alone has been published. Louisiana’s lawsuit over the stopped primary was closed because the people who filed it dropped it, according to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).23 See Conflicts Between the Executive and the Courts, Federal Actions on Election Administration, Prosecutions and Investigations of Trump Critics and The 2026 Midterms.

Status

Item Status Latest development (date) What would change it
Texas 2025 map In force Republicans’ net result was −1 seat (Nov 3, 2026)6 —
California Prop 50 map In force Democrats flipped seats, including CA-48 and CA-1 (Nov 3)6 —
North Carolina and Ohio maps In force Democrats flipped OH-10 under the new Ohio map (Nov 3, 2026)6 —
Utah court-ordered map In force Ben McAdams won the Democratic UT-1 seat (Nov 3, 2026)6 A Utah Supreme Court ruling on which court may hear the legislature’s appeal (argued Oct 5, 2026)51
Indiana redraw Concluded House passed the map 57–41 (Dec 5, 2025);60 Senate rejected it 19–31 (Dec 11, 2025)17 —
Missouri 2025 map Concluded Voters rejected the map through Prop A, 62–38 (AP call). They also approved Amendment 6, which bars the legislature from overriding referendum results (Nov 3, 2026).32 Under the 2022 map, Democrats flipped MO-26 —
Kansas, Georgia and South Carolina efforts Concluded No new map passed (Kansas;50 South Carolina, May 26, 2026;27 Georgia, Jun 17)54 —
New York state-court redraw order Concluded The people who brought the case dropped it (Mar 19, 2026)49 —
New York SB 10637 amendment Pending Passed the legislature for the first time (Jun 17, 2026)49 A second vote in the legislature, then a public vote, possibly in 202749
Virginia map amendment Blocked Virginia Supreme Court threw it out (May 8, 2026); U.S. Supreme Court refused to pause that ruling (May 15)22,55 —
Lucas racketeering case Pending Indictment made public (Oct 22, 2026)48 Federal court proceedings; next date not in the record
Louisiana post-Callais map In force Eliminated a Black-majority Democratic seat. The Nov 3 jungle primary, with all candidates on one ballot, sent LA-6 to a runoff between Chauna Banks (D) and state Sen. Blake Miguez (R)6,7 Dec 12 LA-6 runoff;7 a ruling in Callais v. Landry54
Louisiana suspended-primary suit Concluded The League of Women Voters/ACLU suit was closed when the people who filed it dropped it, according to the ACLU case page23 —
Florida map In force Democrats held or won FL-14, 22 and 25 (Nov 3)6 —
Tennessee map In force Republican Brent Taylor won TN-9, 49.6–48.5 over Justin Pearson (Nov 3, 2026)33 Two pending federal cases54
Alabama 2023 map In force Rep. Shomari Figures (D) held AL-2, 53.8–46.2; the state’s delegation is 5R–2D (Nov 3, 2026)34 —
Mississippi legislative redraw order Concluded 2024 order reversed (May 18, 2026)54,66 —
Maryland Question 3 In force Approved by voters (Nov 3, 2026)31 A separate map bill, possibly in January 2027 for use in 2028, which could eliminate Rep. Andy Harris’s Republican seat31
Colorado Amendment 86 Pending About 46.5% voted yes, below the 55% needed. It was certified for the ballot Aug 3168 after the state supreme court threw out three other initiatives, Nos. 240, 241 and 242 (Jun 29)67,56 AP call (not made as of Nov 6)56
Census excluding unauthorized immigrants Unresolved Census Bureau planned a citizenship question in its 2030 practice test (Feb 6, 2026)9,62 —

Who is affected

Maps redrawn mid-decade affect voters by changing the district they vote in. They also change how many seats each party can win in a state.1 After Callais, maps in Louisiana, Alabama and Tennessee removed or split districts where most voters are Black. Those maps affect Black voters in those states.4,25,26,24 Louisiana voters were also affected when the primary was stopped while absentee voting was underway.23 Missouri voters were affected when the state rejected their referendum petition. Later, they voted on the map.28,32 Indiana Republican legislators received threats. Trump backed primary challengers against Republicans who opposed the map.17,18 Trump’s census order affects unauthorized immigrants, because he said they would not be counted.8

Key players

Chronology

Sources


  1. Center for American Progress: Trump ordered Texas to gerrymander 5 new Republican-leaning districts · Washington Post: Redistricting roundup · Timeline 2025-08-20 → ledger ↩↩↩↩↩

  2. CNN: Abbott signs new Republican-friendly US House map · Texas Tribune: Texas mid-decade map · Timeline 2025-08-20 → ledger ↩↩↩↩↩

  3. NPR: 5 takeaways from the 2025 elections · PBS/AP: Democrats cruise to victory · Timeline 2025-11-04 → ledger ↩↩↩

  4. Supreme Court: Louisiana v. Callais, No. 24-109 (opinion, Apr 29, 2026) · Timeline 2026-04-29 → ledger ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩

  5. CBS Miami: DeSantis signs new congressional map into law · The Hill: DeSantis signs new GOP-favored congressional map · Timeline 2026-05-04 → ledger ↩↩↩↩

  6. CBS News: House election results · Timeline 2026-11-03 → ledger ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩

  7. WAFB: Banks, Miguez advance to runoff in Louisiana’s 6th District · Timeline 2026-11-03 → ledger ↩↩↩↩

  8. NPR: Trump wants a new census to exclude people here illegally · CNBC: Trump orders “new” census · Timeline 2025-08-07 → ledger ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩

  9. PBS/AP: Census Bureau to use survey with citizenship question in 2030 test · Timeline 2025-08-07 → ledger ↩↩↩↩

  10. The Hill: Abbott threatens to oust Texas Democrats over redistricting walkout · CBS Chicago: Bomb threat prompts evacuation at hotel where Texas Democrats are staying · Timeline 2025-08-20 → ledger ↩↩

  11. CNN: Federal court bars Texas from using new map · Timeline 2025-08-20 → ledger ↩↩↩↩

  12. Supreme Court: Order list, Apr 27, 2026 (Abbott v. LULAC, No. 25-845) · NPR: Supreme Court lets Texas use gerrymandered U.S. House map · Timeline 2025-08-20 → ledger ↩↩↩↩↩

  13. NPR: Supreme Court lets Texas use gerrymandered U.S. House map · Timeline 2025-12-04 → ledger ↩↩↩↩

  14. Ballotpedia: Redistricting in Missouri ahead of the 2026 elections · Timeline 2025-08-20 → ledger ↩

  15. NCSL: Tracking mid-decade redistricting · Ballotpedia: 2026 redistricting tracker · Timeline 2025-08-20 → ledger ↩↩

  16. PBS/AP: Utah judge adopts map creating Democratic-leaning district · Timeline 2025-11-10 → ledger ↩↩↩

  17. NPR: Indiana lawmakers reject Trump-backed redistricting plan · CNN: Trump’s primary revenge in Indiana · Timeline 2025-12-11 → ledger ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩

  18. NBC News: Trump exacts revenge in Indiana over redistricting vote, with five GOP legislators defeated · Timeline 2025-12-11 → ledger ↩↩↩

  19. Supreme Court: Malliotakis v. Williams, No. 25A914 (PDF) · State Court Report: Supreme Court asserts new shadow-docket powers over state courts · Timeline 2026-03-02 → ledger ↩↩↩↩

  20. CNN: Trump’s Virginia “rigged” claim · Cardinal News: He’s wrong, here are the facts · Timeline 2026-04-22 → ledger ↩↩↩↩

  21. CBS News: FBI searches office of L. Louise Lucas · Timeline 2026-05-06 → ledger ↩↩

  22. CNN: Virginia Supreme Court blocks redistricting referendum · Timeline 2026-05-08 → ledger ↩↩↩↩↩

  23. NBC News: Louisiana delays House primaries after Supreme Court ruling · ACLU: Civil rights groups file emergency federal challenge · Timeline 2026-04-29 → ledger ↩↩↩↩↩

  24. The Hill: Judge declines to halt Tennessee GOP map · Timeline 2026-05-04 → ledger ↩↩↩↩

  25. PBS NewsHour (AP): Louisiana passes new congressional map to eliminate majority-Black district, give GOP another seat · Timeline 2026-05-29 → ledger ↩↩↩↩

  26. NBC News: Supreme Court allows Alabama map eliminating Black district · Timeline 2026-05-29 → ledger ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩

  27. NBC News: South Carolina redistricting effort fails · Timeline 2026-05-26 → ledger ↩↩

  28. Missouri Independent: Redistricting referendum blocked by secretary of state · Washington Post/AP: Missouri election chief rejects bid for public vote · Timeline 2026-08-04 → ledger ↩↩↩↩↩

  29. AP: Missouri Supreme Court blocks map · Democracy Docket: Missouri election official held in contempt · Timeline 2026-09-03 → ledger ↩↩↩

  30. SCOTUSblog: For the third time, Supreme Court declines to allow Missouri to use congressional map expected to aid Republicans · Timeline 2026-09-25 → ledger ↩↩

  31. NBC News: Maryland voters approve Democratic-backed redistricting amendment · Common Cause Maryland: 2026 special session on redistricting · Timeline 2026-11-03 → ledger ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩

  32. St. Louis Public Radio: Missourians reject Proposition A · Timeline 2026-11-03 → ledger ↩↩↩

  33. Action News 5: Taylor declares victory in Tennessee’s redrawn District 9 · Timeline 2026-11-03 → ledger ↩↩

  34. Yellowhammer News: Shomari Figures defeats Rhett Marques, 53.8% to 46.2% · WTVM: Figures wins re-election · Timeline 2026-11-03 → ledger ↩↩

  35. LII: U.S. Constitution, Article I (§ 4, cl. 1, Elections Clause) legal authority ↩↩

  36. LII: League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) legal authority ↩↩

  37. LII: Rucho v. Common Cause, 588 U.S. 684 (2019) legal authority ↩↩

  38. LII: U.S. Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment (§ 1, Equal Protection Clause) legal authority ↩↩

  39. LII: 52 U.S.C. § 10301 (Voting Rights Act § 2) legal authority ↩↩

  40. LII: U.S. Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment (§ 2, apportionment by “whole number of persons”) legal authority ↩↩

  41. LII: U.S. Constitution, Article I (§ 2, cl. 3, “actual Enumeration” as Congress “shall by Law direct”) legal authority ↩↩

  42. LII: 13 U.S.C. § 141 (subsection (e)(2): mid-decade census data not used for apportionment or congressional districts) legal authority ↩↩

  43. Library of Congress, U.S. Reports: Purcell v. Gonzalez, 549 U.S. 1 (2006) legal authority ↩↩

  44. Supreme Court: Louisiana v. Callais, No. 24-109 (Apr 29, 2026) legal authority ↩↩

  45. Virginia Law: Constitution of Virginia, Art. XII, § 1 (amendments; passage after intervening House of Delegates election) legal authority ↩

  46. Florida Senate: Florida Constitution, Art. III, § 20 (standards for congressional districts) legal authority ↩

  47. U.S. Department of Justice: Justice Manual § 9-85.500 (actions that may have an impact on an election) legal authority ↩

  48. Cardinal News: 10 things to know about the indictment of Louise Lucas · Protect Democracy: Retaliatory Actions Tracker (Lucas entry) · Timeline 2026-10-22 → ledger ↩↩↩↩↩↩

  49. NCSL: Changing the Maps · PolicyMap: Redistricting Tracker · Timeline 2026-06-17 → ledger ↩↩↩↩↩↩

  50. NCSL: Changing the Maps · PolicyMap: Redistricting Tracker · Timeline 2025-08-20 → ledger ↩↩↩↩

  51. PBS/AP: Federal court rejects GOP-led effort to block House map that helps Democrats in Utah · NCSL: Changing the Maps · Timeline 2025-11-10 → ledger ↩↩↩

  52. Texas Tribune: Federal court blocks new Texas congressional map for 2026 · NCSL: Changing the Maps · Timeline 2025-11-18 → ledger ↩↩

  53. Ballotpedia: 2026 redistricting tracker · NCSL: Changing the Maps · Timeline 2026-05-04 → ledger ↩

  54. Reuters: Florida Supreme Court leaves GOP map in place · NCSL: Changing the Maps · PolicyMap: Redistricting Tracker · Timeline 2026-05-29 → ledger ↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩↩

  55. USA Today: Supreme Court rejects Virginia Democrats · NCSL: Changing the Maps · Timeline 2026-05-08 → ledger ↩↩↩↩↩

  56. Colorado Sun: Amendment 86 results · PolicyMap: Redistricting Tracker · Timeline 2026-11-03 → ledger ↩↩

  57. NCSL: Changing the Maps · Common Cause Maryland: 2026 special legislative session on redistricting · Timeline 2026-11-03 → ledger ↩↩↩

  58. KTLA: Supreme Court won’t block Prop 50 congressional districts · NPR: The Supreme Court lets California use its new, Democratic-friendly congressional map · Timeline 2026-02-04 → ledger ↩

  59. NCSL: Changing the Maps · Timeline 2025-11-03 → ledger ↩

  60. Democracy Docket: Indiana House Passes Trump Gerrymander, Sending Map to Uncertain Senate Vote · Timeline 2025-12-05 → ledger ↩↩

  61. NBC News: Trump exacts revenge in Indiana over redistricting vote, with five GOP legislators defeated · Timeline 2026-05-05 → ledger ↩↩

  62. PBS/AP: Census Bureau to use survey with citizenship question in 2030 test · Timeline 2026-02-06 → ledger ↩↩↩↩

  63. NPR: Supreme Court lets Texas use gerrymandered U.S. House map · Timeline 2025-11-21 → ledger ↩

  64. NCSL: Changing the Maps · Timeline 2026-05-12 → ledger ↩

  65. Ballotpedia: 2026 redistricting tracker · NCSL: Changing the Maps · Timeline 2026-05-26 → ledger ↩

  66. NCSL: Changing the Maps · Timeline 2026-05-18 → ledger ↩↩

  67. Colorado Sun: Colorado Supreme Court rejects Democratic redistricting initiatives (Jun 29, 2026) · Timeline 2026-06-29 → ledger ↩

  68. Colorado Sun: Conservative-backed redistricting measure makes Colorado ballot (Aug 31, 2026) · Timeline 2026-08-31 → ledger ↩

  69. NCSL: Changing the Maps · Timeline 2026-09-03 → ledger ↩

  70. Supreme Court order list, Apr 27, 2026 (Abbott v. LULAC reversed) (PDF) · Timeline 2026-04-27 → ledger ↩↩

  71. Democracy Docket: Missouri election official held in contempt · Timeline 2026-09-10 → ledger ↩↩

  72. Texas Tribune: Texas GOP’s gerrymander backfires in U.S. House races · NCSL: Changing the Maps · Timeline 2026-11-03 → ledger ↩↩